News
As athletes begin sharing in the revenue, the next decade will determine whether they gain real negotiating power. Part 1 of ...
Part 4 of our series on the future of college athletics focuses on the fate of mid-major programs as the power conferences ...
North Carolina’s Deborah Ross among 10 U.S. representatives who sign letter questioning if women athletes will be treated ...
As athletes begin sharing in the revenue, the next decade will determine whether they gain real negotiating power. Part 2 of ...
For the first time in more than 50 years, as classes begin, students at North Carolina won't have the opportunity to try out ...
U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, approved a $2.576 billion settlement in House v. NCAA on June 6 that goes beyond merely expanding name, image and ...
Now finalized, the much-anticipated antitrust settlement in House v. NCAA will introduce a new era of college athletics with ...
Colleges are allowed $20.5 million in revenue sharing with athletes this year, but some question if women athletes will get ...
The implications of the NCAA's House settlement on revenue sharing with student athletes may have ripple effects on academic programs like accounting.
There was a time when the SEC was the unquestioned king of college football as evidenced by 13 national titles over the last ...
OMAHA, Neb. — In June the University of Nebraska Omaha announced it will not opt in to the NCAA House settlement, which makes it so schools can now directly pay players through licensing deals.
The House v. NCAA settlement passed and schools will begin paying players as part of the $2.8 billion revenue-sharing agreement, but where is the oversight?
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results