As athletes begin sharing in the revenue, the next decade will determine whether they gain real negotiating power. Part 1 of ...

Part 4 of our series on the future of college athletics focuses on the fate of mid-major programs as the power conferences ...

U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, approved a $2.576 billion settlement in House v. NCAA on June 6 that goes beyond merely expanding name, image and ...

North Carolina’s Deborah Ross among 10 U.S. representatives who sign letter questioning if women athletes will be treated ...

For the first time in more than 50 years, as classes begin, students at North Carolina won't have the opportunity to try out ...

It’s a massive change in our world,” UNC athletic director Darren Dunn said. “It is a significant milestone in college athletics and it means a lot more work for our staff, staying up with ...

When the House v. NCAA settlement received preliminary approval, schools prepared for new roster limits to go into place. For football, that figure is set at 105. However, the SEC took a different ...

Now finalized, the much-anticipated antitrust settlement in House v. NCAA will introduce a new era of college athletics with ...

There was a time when the SEC was the unquestioned king of college football as evidenced by 13 national titles over the last ...

With all the talk about revenue-sharing in college sports, front-loaded NIL packages, multi-million-dollar quarterbacks and looming Congressional involvement, all but overlooked has been the elephant ...

The implications of the NCAA's House settlement on revenue sharing with student athletes may have ripple effects on academic programs like accounting.

The House v. NCAA settlement passed and schools will begin paying players as part of the $2.8 billion revenue-sharing agreement, but where is the oversight?